On Friday, April 8, I presented a paper at the Unitarian Universalist Emerging Scholars Conference hosted by Starr King School for the Ministry and also co-sponsored with Starr King by Harvard Divinity School, Meadville-Lombard Theological School and the Unitarian Universalist Association Panel on Theological Education. I recommend checking out the Tikkun Daily posting by Michael Hogue (Meadville-Lombard) that discusses this invigorating experience.
On Monday, March 28, 2011, I presented a paper on the Womanist/Pan-African section’s panel at WECSOR, entitled “New Womanist, Religious and Theological Lenses in the Study of the African Diaspora,” in Whittier, California. My paper will be one of three on the panel and is entitled: “‘The Story Can Be Told Another Way:’ The Contributions of Womanist Ethics to the Principle of Respect for Autonomy in Bioethics.” The paper presentation represents a project very much in-progress.
I enter the dialogue between womanist ethics and bioethics through a very recent and very public example of the intersection of race, health and ethics: the ant-choice billboard campaign protesting Planned Parenthood: “The Most Dangerous Place for an African American is in the Womb.” In many ways, this destructive ad campaign, which has been featured in Illinois, Texas, Florida and NY, represents the need for bioethics to be responsive to womanist theo-ethical lenses in new ways: invoking the African American woman’s womb as a place of danger has an unsettling history to say the least. Where is the principle of respect for autonomy and its underlying framework for morality now? How does womanist analysis of the fantastic hegemonic imagination help illuminate how “the story” of Black women’s wombs (and even Planned Parenthood) “can be told another way?”
Stay tuned for a posting of my presentation along with (hopefully) a podcast.